Top Menu

LPFM Watch

LPFM Watch: Why 420 Apps Were Dismissed, and More News

The flow of new low-power FM construction permits is slowing to a trickle as the FCC gets towards the end of the singleton applications. Many of the 19 stations authorized in the last week require a 2nd adjacent waiver in order to be spaced a little closer to existing stations. Commensurately, a fair number of them are located in urban metros.

We’ll see a lot more urban LPFM construction permits when the FCC starts resolving MX groups, where multiple applicants are vying for the same frequency. While it’s predictable that large metropolitan areas would have more groups interested in a station, the flip-side is that those radio dials are more crowded, hence more competition.

Why 420 Applications Were Dismissed

REC Networks' summary of LPFM dismissals.

REC Networks’ summary of LPFM dismissals.

On Tuesday REC Networks posted to Facebook a summary of reasons why LPFM applications have been dismissed so far. Out of 420 dismissals the largest proportion came as a result of a request by the applicant, counting for 152 of them. The second most common reason is for short-spacing, where the proposed frequency is too close to another station.

Fifteen applications were dismissed because the applicant was an individual rather than a non-profit group, as required. The FCC rejected another eighteen because one person’s name was listed as an organization’s board member on more than one application and eight were dismissed because someone on the application has an “attributable interest” in an existing station. Both are big no-nos for a service where it’s one station per customer.

Interestingly, five applications were dismissed for failing to submit an educational statement or having a weak one. I would be particularly interested in seeing what a weak educational statement looks like, if indeed there is one in this group.

LPFMs: Don’t Forget Emergency Alert

Radio World published a helpful reminder that despite their low power, LPFMs still must participated in the Emergency Alert System. Minimally, this requires having the requisite EAS equipment installed to receive and broadcast emergency messages. That’s something new stations should plan for when building out their studios and broadcast chain.

LPFM Watch is a weekly feature on Radio Survivor appearing every Thursday.

Just one dollar a month makes you a patron of Radio Survivor. Help us through our Patreon Campaign!


, , , , ,

One Response to LPFM Watch: Why 420 Apps Were Dismissed, and More News

  1. Michi Bradley March 20, 2014 at 4:48 pm #

    To look at the reason code that we entered for a specific applicant, use the REC broadcast query tool at (you may have to click on the show archived records link)..

    There may be times when there was more than one reason for the dismissal, I used the more severe of the reasons.

    Also, if the applicant is co-channel or first adjacent short spaced (998) or has no second adjacent channel waiver (993), these applicants can’t amend and request reinstatement while applicants showing with “weak” second adjacent waiver requests (986) can be reinstated if reconsideration is requested and the application is revised within 30 days of the dismissal.

    Michi Bradley
    founder, REC Networks

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes