Top Menu

All Access brings on-demand Spotify competitor to the Googleverse

Google Play All Access logoGoogle introduced its entry into the on-demand music streaming market at its recent developer conference Google I/O. Sitting atop its existing Google Play media store, the awkwardly named Google Play All Access provides Spotify-like listening to a large music library, along with the ability to build playlists or tune in to artist-based radio stations.

Unlike many other Google services, All Access carries a fee of $9.99 a month without ads, with a limited $7.99 monthly rate available to customers who sign up now. A 30-day free trial is also available, which I signed up for so that I could audition the service this week. This single rate gives full access to the service on mobile devices as well as the desktop browser. By comparison Spotify’s ad free unlimited service is $4.99 a month, or $9.99 a month for mobile access.

Anyone who has used a service like Spotify, Rdio or Rhapsody will find All Access familiar. On a personal computer it functions through your browser–unlike Spotify–or through an app on an Android device. Although Google has not released an iOS app, an unofficial app is already available in the iTunes store.

At first listen I found the sound quality to be quite good. I’m presuming that All Access serves up the same 320 kbps MP3 files that can be purchased from the Play store. This is a higher bitrate and quality than available with a free Spotify account, but roughly equivalent to the quality heard with a paid Spotify account. However, aside from the free 30-day trial, Google does not offer an ad-supported free version like Spotify does.

Presumably because Google has been able to strike slightly different deals with music labels, I’ve found some slight differences between the library of music found in All Access compared to Spotify, but the overall coverage is about the same. While Google also sells MP3s in its play store, not every artist or album available for sale is also represented in the All Access streaming library.

Like Spotify, Google’s All Access offers radio streams that pick tracks based upon a seed artist or genre. In my experience I still think Pandora is the standard bearer in terms of serving up a wider variety of consonant artists and songs based upon your initial selections.

Google All Access Radio QueueBut one thing I like about the All Access approach to radio is that once you select a station it shows you the queue of about 20 upcoming tracks, giving you an idea of what artists and songs are next. You can even rearrange or remove tracks from the queue. Google can offer this additional level of control because All Access is an on-demand service, with different contracts and royalties than Pandora, which is statutorily limited in the user control it may offer without having to strike individual deals with record labels. This also means that Pandora offers a deeper library of music, but without the instant playability of All Access, Spotify, Rdio, Rhapsody and MOG.

The All Access user interface is a little less intuitive than Spotify’s and other services’. Like many other Google services it is clean if indistinctive. On several occasions it took me some searching to navigate back and forth. In particular, I haven’t quite figured out the direct URL for the All Access service itself. The only reliable way in I’ve found is to go to the Google Play homepage and click on the banner ad offering up an All Access trial, and then clicking on “Try free for 30 days” button on that next page. It’s the same route I used to sign up in the first place. But if I’m already logged in with my Google account, I’m then routed to the All Access interface.

In the crowded on demand music service field there’s not a lot to differentiate All Access from competitors like Spotify or Rdio. I suppose there’s an advantage for someone already invested in the Google Play universe, since Google offers free cloud storage and streaming of 20,000 songs alongside unlimited storage for any music purchased from the Play store. This seems particularly useful for Android smartphone users who can then listen to their personal cloud library alongside All Access music, playlists and radio through a single app.

However, for someone who isn’t already invested in the Google Play universe, or who doesn’t have an Android smartphone, I don’t see any strong argument for choosing All Access over another service. In particular, I don’t really see a reason why a paid Spotify or Rhapsody user should switch, unless she wants to lock in the $7.99 introductory rate and save a couple of bucks a month, at the cost of losing playlists and stations saved in the previous service.

My guess is that Google sees plenty of room for growth in the on demand music market, with the opportunity to entice many new customers by virtue of the company’s ubiquity. There’s plenty of speculation that it’s just a matter of time before Apple and Amazon jump in with their own on demand services to complement their much more prominent online music stores.

It will be entertaining to see if any company offers up a true Spotify-killer, or a feature that is particularly new or innovative. In the meantime I’m not ready to hand over my monthly fee to anyone just yet.

Just one dollar a month makes you a patron of Radio Survivor. Help us through our Patreon Campaign!


, , , , , , ,

8 Responses to All Access brings on-demand Spotify competitor to the Googleverse

  1. Mike May 29, 2013 at 7:35 am #

    I just wanted to point out one error in your review here. You said “This also means that Pandora offers a deeper library of music, but without the instant playability of All Access, Spotify, Rdio, Rhapsody and MOG.” Pandora actually has a significantly smaller library than any of the on-demand services or even Slacker radio. As of their IPO two years ago they had only 800,000 songs, and as of last year they were estimated to have about 1 million songs. Spotify, Google Music, etc… all offer 18-20 million songs.

  2. Cory May 29, 2013 at 11:44 am #

    I’m a HUGE fan of Google’s services, but I’m also a big Spotify fan and don’t see a need to switch. The All Access selection just isn’t up to par in my opinion. I’ve also never been a big fan of the Music app for Android. It just seems cluttered to me. Again, these are my opinions.

  3. Joe June 6, 2013 at 5:25 am #

    I usually like Google products but I’m surprised they’re charging money for this. I think I’ll stick with my free music streaming service, I’m happy with it so I don’t see a good reason to spend money.


  1. iTunes "iRadio" will come out in the iFall (but do iCare?) | Radio Survivor - June 11, 2013

    […] does seem like a bit of an afterthought, however, especially following Google’s All Access […]

  2. Siri: your personal radio deejay? | Radio Survivor - July 16, 2013

    […] at first glance. You can customize channels and such, just as you can with Pandora, Spotify, Google All Access and the […]

  3. When Pandora becomes radio: why exportability matters | Radio Survivor - August 28, 2013

    […] is the ease with which you can publish your Pandora channel, or a Spotify playlist, or an All Access link to your blog, Facebook page, or Twitter stream. It is also the extent to which you can […]

  4. Four reasons why net neutrality matters for mobile radioRadio Survivor - May 26, 2014

    […] will very likely put the music services that moneyed outfits like Apple (iTunes Radio), Google (All Access), and Microsoft (Xbox Music) offer in the proverbial cat bird seat, and the more independent […]

  5. When can I vote for Bollywood tunes at my local restaurant?Radio Survivor - August 4, 2014

    […] service up and running at some point in the remainder of this year. If it is going to be boring as Google All Access then no rush, I can […]

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes