Top Menu

Clear Channel: laying off deejays; still pushing for deregulation

The New York Times reports that Clear Channel is laying off radio deejays across the country, perhaps in the hundreds. These include Tony Lynn and Myles Copeland of Clear Channel Albuquerque country music station KBQI, shown in the YouTube video below. But two weeks before the story came out, the radio giant once again asked the Federal Communications Commission to relax the limits on how many frequencies a single entity can own.

On October 11, Clear Channel representative Lawrence Sidman met with FCC Chief of Staff Edward Lazarus and Jessica Almond, Special Council to Commission Chair Julius Genachowski. According to the ex parte summary, Sidman maintained:

that the Commission can no longer reasonably justify retaining the AM/FM subcap provisions in light of the extremely significant technological developments and regulatory changes that have occurred in recent years, as well as the current state of the broadcast radio marketplace.  Moreover, based upon empirical data available as a result of Clear Channel’s previous station divestments, there is a high probability that repeal of the AM/FM subcap provisions will result in notably increased minority and female ownership of broadcast properties, a critically important and unfortunately all too elusive policy goal of the Commission.

Translation: thanks to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC’s rules say that there’s no limit on the number of commercial stations a company can own nationally. That’s why Clear Channel presently holds about 800. But in “sub” markets like New York or Los Angeles (45+ stations), an entity can only own up to eight commercial licenses. Then the allowed number tapers down for lesser markets. In regions with 14 or fewer stations, an entity can own no more than five.

Clear Channel wants all those limits to go away.

The FCC is currently reviewing its media ownership rules. The comments in the proceeding, Clear Channel says, reflect “a broad cross-section of the radio industry, evidence the existence of a vibrant market for transactions that could enhance efforts to increase minority and female ownership and stimulate job growth and technological innovation in the radio industry were Commission to repeal the AM/FM subcaps.”

What does this mean? Probably that Clear Channel would like to sell some smaller radio stations and buy a bunch of bigger ones, but the FCC’s subcap rules gum up the plan. How casting them aside will “stimulate job growth” is unclear, given the layoffs that have just taken place in an already heavily deregulated market.

Just one dollar a month makes you a patron of Radio Survivor. Help us through our Patreon Campaign!


, ,

3 Responses to Clear Channel: laying off deejays; still pushing for deregulation

  1. James October 30, 2011 at 8:29 pm #

    So wait, CC lays off a bunch of people in the shadow of a ton of debt they have to service, then want to buy more stations? They want more stations they can’t afford? I hope the FCC isn’t that stupid.

  2. PF October 31, 2011 at 8:37 am #

    If by “significant technological developments” they mean HD Radio can somebody please show me any HD Radio currently on the market for sale that actually has AM?

  3. Jeremy Lansman October 31, 2011 at 10:07 pm #

    ok… Today I bought a Belken FM adapter for my Android phone. I downloaded software so I can now listen to stations like Africa 1 or BBC radio 4 on my FM car radio while driving the roads of North America via what was TV broadcast spectrum. Er… yah… a lot of cell phone traffic runs on expropriated television spectrum… and yes.. my cell phone radio is not free to air.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes